-
1. Re: Chart component naming
jhuska Sep 10, 2014 7:20 AM (in response to michpetrov)I feel the same need as you Michal. Giving there a prefix chart would be sufficient solution for me.
Just a side note, I can guess what all elements means, except the rich:series.
Regards
Juro
-
2. Re: Chart component naming
manovotn Sep 10, 2014 7:38 AM (in response to michpetrov)I totally agree, docs might prove confusing the way the are.
+1 for prefix, it is a viable solution
-
3. Re: Chart component naming
bleathem Sep 10, 2014 1:33 PM (in response to manovotn)Nice observation Michal.
I'd say the rich:column doesn't have a prefix because it can be used
with a number of components, not just the table ones.
+1 for the "chart" prefix. Can you go ahead and file a jira for
4.5.0.CR1 for this?
Brian
On 14-09-10 04:38 AM, Matej Novotny wrote:
I totally agree, docs might prove confusing the way the are.
+1 for prefix, it is a viable solution
Posted by forums
Original post: https://developer.jboss.org/message/903413#903413
_______________________________________________
richfaces-dev mailing list
_______________________________________________
richfaces-dev mailing list
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev