-
1. Re: Dead letter service
marklittle Mar 5, 2007 11:03 AM (in response to kurtstam)Yes, a configurable service endpoint with different implementations works too. I was originally thinking of putting the logic in the CBR, but the service idea is better. Nice.
-
2. Re: Dead letter service
daniel.brum Mar 5, 2007 11:04 AM (in response to kurtstam)I also agree with Mark's point, maybe make the message-store the default choice of where the CBR send's it's undeliverable messages.
-
3. Re: Dead letter service
marklittle Mar 5, 2007 11:08 AM (in response to kurtstam)I think our responses got interleaved. I'm assuming a separate DLQ Service is what Kurt was proposing, with different implementations able to implement different policies. I like that. One implementation could be based on my suggestion for processing logic, with the messaging store as the default.
-
4. Re: Dead letter service
kurtstam Mar 5, 2007 11:13 AM (in response to kurtstam)Right. that's what I meant. This way we have maximum flexibility. Daniel can work on his message store implementation while I add the default configuration and routing to this service?
Is this all covered by http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-418, or is the default message store implementation covered by something else? -
5. Re: Dead letter service
daniel.brum Mar 5, 2007 11:27 AM (in response to kurtstam)For the message-store implementation, you need to define what you want to store, and how you want to retrieve, and i guess clean-up redelivered messages.
-
6. Re: Dead letter service
kurtstam Mar 5, 2007 11:35 AM (in response to kurtstam)Right, should we open a different jira for this functionality?
-
-
8. Re: Dead letter service
kurtstam Mar 5, 2007 12:07 PM (in response to kurtstam)http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-453
Daniel, I assigned it to you, but I'll help out on this.
--Kurt -
9. Re: Dead letter service
daniel.brum Mar 11, 2007 5:19 PM (in response to kurtstam)committed some changes to support this, please see http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-453
thx