-
1. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
ilya_shaikovsky Jun 16, 2010 8:39 AM (in response to yyq2009)this is a question to netBeans guys, I do not sure on which artifacts them relies when adds taglib namespaces to the list and where them looking for them. Our ui jars contains all *.taglib.xml files properly defined so them should be there.
-
2. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
averri Jun 16, 2010 12:53 PM (in response to yyq2009)I have the same problem. What is the solution !?
Interesting information: the RichFaces 3.3.3 works well.
-
3. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
jbalunas Jun 16, 2010 1:45 PM (in response to averri)I have created https://jira.jboss.org/browse/RF-8766 to cover this.
As Ilya said we are packaging all of the tab-libs, and descriptors, so I am surprised. We'll investigate for the M1 release in July.
Thanks,
Jay
-
4. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
ilya_shaikovsky Jun 16, 2010 3:47 PM (in response to averri)I will also try that asap.. just has no netBeans installed (recently has environment change)
sorry for inconvinience
-
5. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
yyq2009 Jun 17, 2010 8:15 AM (in response to ilya_shaikovsky)Hi, I hava found that netbeans can detected the *.taglib.xml like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<facelet-taglib xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facelettaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
version="2.0">
<namespace>http://company.com</namespace>.....
but RF 4A2 is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<javaee:facelet-taglib xmlns:javaee="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" version="2.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facelettaglibrary_2_0.xsd" id="rich">
<javaee:namespace>http://richfaces.org/rich</javaee:namespace>What's the difference? Does it effect anything?
-
6. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
ilya_shaikovsky Jun 17, 2010 8:19 AM (in response to yyq2009)doh.. I believe it should not.. and not sure why we not used default namespace. I created jira item for M1.
Thanks for your help and efforts. https://jira.jboss.org/browse/RF-8769
-
7. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
kislo_metal Jun 28, 2010 6:22 AM (in response to yyq2009)Hi all.
Same for IntellijIDEA 9.0.1 & 9.0.2 EAP
After changes that was described by Daniel Yang, everything work in ide . (using maven for building and local librari with changes in *.taglib.xml)
-
8. Re: RichFaces 4.0.0.ALPHA 2 problem
nbelaevski Jun 29, 2010 6:58 PM (in response to kislo_metal)Cross-link for NB forum: http://forums.netbeans.org/viewtopic.php?t=28500&highlight=richfaces