Also, when I add this to my webservice:

@SchemaValidation( enabled=true, errorHandler=nl.kb.hrd.dd.karakterisering.impls.ValidationErrorHandler.class, schemaLocation="ergens")

and send an invalid request, nothing happens (or seems to happen). The request just gets passed, the handler is not called, and I see no errormessage about the invalid schemaLocation.

A related question: in the JAX-WS RI, it does not seem to be necessary to specify the schema location. Why is it needed here ?

Thanks !

Luc.

Hi Thomas,

I am probably overlooking something, because I cannot find a proper test for the @SchemaValidation annotation.

There are two endpoint classes, org.jboss.test.ws.jaxws.jbws1172.ValidatingEndpoint.java and NonValidatingEndpoint.java

The annotation processor processes the @SchemaValidation annotation by adding the relevant feature to the endpoint.

However, in JBWS1172TestCase.java, the testcases ignore the defined endpoints, and instead add the validating feature to endpoints defined in the testcode. So, to me it seems the handling of the @SchemaValidation annotation is not tested here. Is there another test for this maybe ?

Cheers, Luc.

Another sign that I am probably missing something: In the jaxws source I cannot find any reference to the class

SchemaValidationFeature

of which an instance is added to the endpoint (except in the processor doing this). So looking at the source I have here (which must be incomplete) it seems it is added to the endpoint but never used.

Cheers, Luc.

...never mind, found it. My bad.

The question about where the annotation is tested remains.

Cheers, Luc.

Hi,

> The question about where the annotation is tested remains.

And still remains...maybe I should repeat what the question was, so people do'nt have to search for it by looking through all previous posts.

The question was:

I am probably overlooking something, because I cannot find a proper test for the @SchemaValidation annotation.

There are two endpoint classes, org.jboss.test.ws.jaxws.jbws1172.ValidatingEndpoint.java and NonValidatingEndpoint.java

The annotation processor processes the @SchemaValidation annotation by adding the relevant feature to the endpoint.

However, in JBWS1172TestCase.java, the testcases ignore the defined endpoints, and instead add the validating feature to endpoints defined in the testcode. So, to me it seems the handling of the @SchemaValidation annotation is not tested here. Is there another test for this maybe ?

If I cannot get this to work, I am considering switching to the metro implementation, which should have support for this (added november last year I think).

Cheers, Luc.

Hi,

I am still hoping someone can answer this question for me. Is there a testcase for the @SchemaValidation annotation ?

Cheers, Luc.

Hi Richard,

Thanks for the reply. As mentioned in the previous posts, I already got the source from jbossws-3.0.1-native-2.0.4.GA-src.zip and examined the org/jboss/test/ws/jaxws/jbws1172/* tests. This caused me to wonder if I missed something, because there I did _not_ find a test for the annotation. Quoting myself:

"I am probably overlooking something, because I cannot find a proper test for the @SchemaValidation annotation.

There are two endpoint classes, org.jboss.test.ws.jaxws.jbws1172.ValidatingEndpoint.java and NonValidatingEndpoint.java

The annotation processor processes the @SchemaValidation annotation by adding the relevant feature to the endpoint.

However, in JBWS1172TestCase.java, the testcases ignore the defined endpoints, and instead add the validating feature to endpoints defined in the testcode. So, to me it seems the handling of the @SchemaValidation annotation is not tested here. Is there another test for this maybe ? ".

If the question is not clear please let me know and I will try to clarify.

Cheers, Luc.

A reply would be appreciated !

A reply would still be appreciated. Does the schema validation feature really work ?

Cheers, Luc.

A reply would _really_ be appreciated. I know that support here is on a best effort basis, but I am still hoping to get a useful answer to this (imho) simple question.

Regards, Luc.