-
1. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
anil.saldhana Nov 17, 2011 11:49 AM (in response to pcraveiro)It came out of http://community.jboss.org/thread/170571?tstart=30
-
2. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
pcraveiro Nov 21, 2011 6:28 AM (in response to anil.saldhana)Ok,
I did see this JIRA before. Do you think a possible/good approach to use the information already present in the picketlink-idfed.xml for the IDP address ?
That way, this information is centralized in just on place and the user do not need to worry about configuring it in the SP's context.xml. Also, to work in a real scenario the user always need to setup this information ......
-
3. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
anil.saldhana Nov 21, 2011 10:26 AM (in response to pcraveiro)Good point, Pedro. It is matter of documentation. The pl-idfed.xml is the right configuration for all users. Only in certain cases would they want to override by specifying directly in the idpAddress.
-
4. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
pcraveiro Nov 21, 2011 11:03 AM (in response to anil.saldhana)So, may I make this change ?
-
5. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
anil.saldhana Nov 21, 2011 2:00 PM (in response to pcraveiro)What is the change you propose? It is not clear to me.
-
6. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
pcraveiro Nov 21, 2011 2:08 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)Automatically get the value of SPRedirectSignatureFormAuthenticator.idpAdress from the SP's picketlink-idfed.xml.
-
7. Re: Is idpAddress property really needed ?
anil.saldhana Nov 21, 2011 4:32 PM (in response to pcraveiro)Go ahead if it is a small change.