1 4 5 6 7 8 Previous Next 149 Replies Latest reply on Mar 24, 2010 8:55 AM by ataylor Go to original post
      • 75. Re: Integration with AS6
        timfox

        Can someone give a revised estimate for completion of this task?

         

        It seems to be turning into another one of those "tasks without end"

        • 76. Re: Integration with AS6
          ataylor
          for my part, sorting the messaging test suite, i should be done for tomorrow. I am not sure of what other tasks need doing. Clebert can you summarize whate else is left, we should try and get this done this week.
          • 77. Re: Integration with AS6
            jason.greene

            timfox wrote:

             

            Can someone give a revised estimate for completion of this task?

             

            It seems to be turning into another one of those "tasks without end"

            Also, I need to know if this can make AS6 M3. The cutoff is March 22.

             

            Thanks!

            • 78. Re: Integration with AS6
              timfox

              Well, if we can't get in done by March 22 we should all look for different jobs

               

              The original estimate for the task was 2-3 weeks. That was about 6 weeks ago.

               

              I'm assuming it will take another week at the most.

               

              Clebert/Andy can you confirm?

              • 79. Re: Integration with AS6
                clebert.suconic

                If this new profile services thing (that appeared now at the end) doesn't drag us more time, I expect to finish cleaning tests by tomorrow or Thursday early in the morning.. and have it merged on AS6/trunk by the end of the week. And i will need another week for TCK.

                 

                That's well beyond my expectations also. I can't move on the AS codebase very well.. everything is heavy... lots of new/old things not well documented.. so it wasn't being very clean how to do things.

                 

                 

                Even at the worse case scenario it would be done before March-22.

                • 80. Re: Integration with AS6
                  timfox
                  Can Andy/Jeff start on the TCK in parallel?
                  • 81. Re: Integration with AS6
                    clebert.suconic

                    There's one thing that was true already for JBoss Messaging 1.4.

                     

                     

                    DLQ handlging is done at HornetQ at the server, not on the resource adapter.

                     

                     

                    There are a few tests with configs like this:

                     

                       <invoker-proxy-bindings>
                          <invoker-proxy-binding>
                             <name>my-message-driven-bean</name>
                             <invoker-mbean>default</invoker-mbean>
                             <proxy-factory>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jms.JMSContainerInvoker</proxy-factory>
                             <proxy-factory-config>
                                <JMSProviderAdapterJNDI>DefaultJMSProvider</JMSProviderAdapterJNDI>
                                <ServerSessionPoolFactoryJNDI>StdJMSPool</ServerSessionPoolFactoryJNDI>
                                <MaximumSize>1</MaximumSize>
                                <MaxMessages>1</MaxMessages>
                                <!--ForceClearOnShutdown>true</ForceClearOnShutdown>
                                <ForceClearAttempts>5</ForceClearAttempts> 
                                <ForceClearInterval>500</ForceClearInterval-->
                                <MDBConfig>
                                   <ReconnectIntervalSec>10</ReconnectIntervalSec>
                                   <DLQConfig>
                                      <DestinationQueue>queue/DLQ</DestinationQueue>
                                      <MaxTimesRedelivered>10</MaxTimesRedelivered>
                                      <TimeToLive>0</TimeToLive>
                                   </DLQConfig>
                                </MDBConfig>
                             </proxy-factory-config>
                          </invoker-proxy-binding>
                       </invoker-proxy-bindings>
                    
                    That's doesn't make sense any more. How should we proceed?
                    • 82. Re: Integration with AS6
                      timfox
                      Those tests won't be valid then.
                      • 83. Re: Integration with AS6
                        timfox
                        Do we even use that config at all? Isn't that just old stuff used with the old JCA adapter?
                        • 84. Re: Integration with AS6
                          clebert.suconic

                          Yes.. that's old stuff and I'm removing from the 10 tests I found this.

                           

                          What I'm referring to them is:

                           

                          - Should AS remove support for this on the proxy at all and throw an exception if this is used

                          - Or should we then just ignore this and throw a big warning on the logs.

                           

                           

                          That's a question more for AS guys.

                          • 85. Re: Integration with AS6
                            timfox
                            I don't think this is stuff is used at all in HornetQ, so how could we throw a warning?
                            • 86. Re: Integration with AS6
                              timfox
                              The old DLQ functionality would still be applicable if the user was using the generic JCA adapter to interface with some other messaging system, it's just not used by HornetQ.
                              • 87. Re: Integration with AS6
                                clebert.suconic

                                I said this question is for AS guys...

                                 

                                So, this question is.. should the AS guys throw an exception if this used? (I said we as we're all JBoss  )

                                 

                                This is set on the proxy anyway which is somewhat weird.

                                 

                                 

                                In regard to what affect HornetQ, I am removing this from the testsuite.

                                • 88. Re: Integration with AS6
                                  timfox

                                  clebert.suconic@jboss.com wrote:

                                   

                                  I said this question is for AS guys...

                                   

                                  So, this question is.. should the AS guys throw an exception if this used? (I said we as we're all JBoss  )


                                  I don't think so.

                                   

                                  The old JCA adaptor is still usable in JBoss AS, that's what you'd often use if you were integrating other non HornetQ messaging systems.

                                   

                                  Like I say, it's just not used by HornetQ. But can be used for other reasons.

                                  • 89. Re: Integration with AS6
                                    brian.stansberry
                                    Please don't just remove these; please disable them (by including them in the badtest.excludes patternset in testsuite/build.xml). And then create a critical M3 JIRA for us to sort them out.
                                    1 4 5 6 7 8 Previous Next