Note: Details in transcript
Maven Repo Updates
- Wiki updates status
- Prabhat resolved 3.x Hudson issues
- Caused by wrong "dav://" protocol
RichFaces 4.0
- Build Structure Updates
- http://community.jboss.org/wiki/RichFaces40BuildDirectoryStructure
- Changes underway
- Prognosed to finish early next week
- Open Questions for build?
- CDK Bom not in project bom?
- Agreed that CDK specific runtime dependencies will stay with CDK
- Reason to require mvn 2.1.0 not 2.0.9?
- There's an issue that may affect our builds fixed in Maven 2.1.0:
- [MNG-3716] - Aggregators that fork lifecycles don't have execution projects setup for all projects in the reactor
- There's an issue that may affect our builds fixed in Maven 2.1.0:
- Module naming
- CDK Bom not in project bom?
- bom|parent\aggregator projects naming
- Import into IDE - nobody does this, so not a problem
- Need to distinguish between different BoMs, so the final variant is like in Weld: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/weld/api/trunk/bom/pom.xml - weld-api-bom
- Looking at http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/richfaces/commons/commons-api - "richfaces-" prefix should be included
- Need another meeting to discuss assembly
- Discussed setting svn:ignore for service folders & files
- Jay and Nick use global ignores configuration
- Added https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RFPL-594
- Archetype plans for A2
- Time required to make a simple jsf 2.0 archetype?
- Very easy to create from any existing projects
- Can be offloaded to QE
- This one looks good: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/qa/people/ppitonak/richfaces-archetype-simpleapp
- Created https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-8647 to include it into release
- Very easy to create from any existing projects
- Time required to make a simple jsf 2.0 archetype?
- Client side bean validation
- Status
- Alex is going to create a little prototype to check suggested architecture
- Wiki page as discussed?
- Alex is working on it
- Status
- Alpha2 Status
- Discussion postponed to staff meeting
- Estimations should be updated by everyone
Comments