1 Reply Latest reply on Sep 9, 2010 11:23 AM by asoldano

    RestEasy stopping a try-catch from completing ?

    crashmeister

      I have the following code in a RS POJO:

      try {
        x = this.get(MyClass).myMethod();
      } catch (MyException me) {
        System.out.println(me.getMessage());
      }
      

      myMethod throws a MyException, but the catch never gets executed. Instead I get:

      org.jboss.resteasy.spi.UnhandledException: Message from MyException
      ...
      Root CauseMessage from MyException
        com.myco.MyClass.myMethod(MyClass.java:2)
        sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) 
        sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.MethodInjectorImpl.invoke(MethodInjectorImpl.java:140)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceMethod.invokeOnTarget(ResourceMethod.java:252)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceMethod.invoke(ResourceMethod.java:217)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceMethod.invoke(ResourceMethod.java:206)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.getResponse(SynchronousDispatcher.java:514)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:491)
        org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:120)
        org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.ServletContainerDispatcher.service(ServletContainerDispatcher.java:200)
        org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServletDispatcher.service(HttpServletDispatcher.java:48)
        org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServletDispatcher.service(HttpServletDispatcher.java:43)
        javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
        org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96)
      

      Any ideas on how to get reasteasy to let the catch handle the error ?

      Thanks,

      Craig.